Is it Possible to Avert Accidental Plagiarism by Students?

Plagiarism, lately has become a very common problem at college level and all students at university level need to be aware and at the same time cautious of it as it can have severe consequences if one isn’t careful or proactive. Often it so happens that researchers or amateur writers indulge in plagiarism out if sheer ignorance and not any deliberate attempt. This may so happen when they aren’t aware of the rules and regulations appropriately. One should not take plagiarism as an unsurmountable challenge, it is possible to overcome or stay away from the concern of plagiarism if novice researchers are careful and cautious of few things while doing research:

For researchers and writers who are at the nascent stage, their work can be compared on the basis of the level or originality that the writer presents. A good writer takes ideas and arguments from existing literature and cites them appropriately weaving their own concept around it where as a poor writer would just simply present an existing concept as his own novel idea.
These few tips can help you to avoid plagiarism for new writers:

  • Do not ever use passages, words, quotations or ideas that already exist and present them as one’s own ideas. It is important to cite every existing idea whether it be written or any other multimedia form.
  • Using the cut and paste method is MS word is very luring and exciting, especially when one is in a rush and wants tom meet a quick deadline. One must never cut and paste the content from any online source but always adopt the method of paraphrasing any idea you intent to use in your research.
  • It isn’t a good idea to duplicate your own work from one document to another as your previous work does not become original for any current work you undertake. Ironical but plagiarism is also applicable on re using your own previous idea without citing them so your become the thief of your own intellectual property.
  • You must undertake group work only in an authorised setting. Often professors do not appreciate researchers work in groups unless it isn’t an assignment. The best kind of learning happens as an individual assignment, so be wary of working on any group assignment in an unauthorized setting.

So be very particular while writing research to never do write any content from another source without adding the citation as little negligence from your side can actually have consequences that would make you repent your act.

Ensure you don’t do these things in your PhD viva

The thought of the PhD VIVA does send shivers down our spine, however all PhD candidates have no choice but to face it up front. If you have some clue about what to do and what not to do it can surely help to ease up your fears so that rather than being a challenging and fearful experience, you enjoy a viva and it becomes a showcase to exhibit your skills and learnings. There are few things you must surely not do in a viva. They are:
1.Do not be very quick to answer your questions, rather take some time to introspect and refer to the relevant part of the thesis if necessary to be prepared as thoroughly as possible
2.Never answer a question that you do not know the answer to. It is always better to not answer or ask for a clarification rather give a response that puts you in a picture of being an ignorant in the eyes of the examiner
3.Even if you know content that is more than what is asked in the question, do not go overboard in answering. You must restrain your answer to precisely what is asked in the question
4.There is a possibility and it is normal to go completely “blank” in your viva. Think of some strategies you could adopt to face a situation like this if it arises, refer to your thesis in the copy you are carrying or you could even ask the examiner to rephrase the question if needed.
5.Under all circumstances, be sure of not bluffing your examiners. It is always better and more of an advantage to admit than to try and bluff. Know that your research has its own set of limitations and it is better to admit those limitations so that you get an opportunity to discuss further research scope.

Some preparation, some practice and lots of confidence in your ability and research are the ingredients that can help you to be able to sail through this last stage of your PhD journey more easily. Research is tough and you put your heart and soul into it, so now also do not let some goof up in the end mess up or dilute the success that you have achieved throughout the long journey. Give your PhD viva with your best food forward.

What is the hardest part of doing a PhD?

You may find the title of the blog really hilarious if you are a research scholar who has experience bundles of hardships through the process. The entire PhD is hard then what is it to find out about the hardest part of doing a PhD. Well according to me as a PhD scholar, is that in the field of research there are not any fixed or accepted standards for evaluating progress of work and in research you have to show and get approval of your work from not one person but many and not one department but many and since standards are evaluation criteria are absent, not everyone is happy at the same time. So whom to please and whom to displease? Do you agree or no that you have encountered this as the hardest part of your journey as researcher?
When you have people who are important in evaluating the progress of your PhD showing dissatisfaction with your work, it surely creeps in insecurity with your progress. In this challenging journey, recognition, praise and acceptance goes a long way in bringing a sense of satisfaction and relief that one is on the right path of progress. With the standards of progress being so tricky, it is very much possible that you walk down the blind alley, unless you have some strong experienced source who is guiding your path. It is all the more true when have subjective opinions boggling you down and making you feel confused dejected, getting fair and right feedback from the sources is the most important thing at that point of time.
Sometimes scholars try to assess their own progress. Remember that in the absence if evaluation criteria that is standardized, you would be not doing justice to your progress. Either you would overrate yourself or feel that your achievements or progress is trivial or insignificant, in either case, it is unfair evaluation. Explaining you work to a person who is away from your research is a better way to fight this challenge as what may seem too less development to you may actually be something very significant. Your research supervisor is the best person here and is actually a very important contributor in your PhD journey that can help you fight with this biggest challenge of research that can actually be generalised for around the globe.